Sapphire Fury Tri-X Is Quieter Than Water Cooled AMD Fury X - Asus Strix Uses Significantly Less Power Than Both
AMD'due south air cooled Fiji board, the Radeon R9 Fury, has finally launched with reviews of Sapphire's Tri-Ten and Asus's Strix models now ample. The new Fiji based Radeon R9 Fury graphics card is the air cooled younger sibling of the company's h2o-cooled $650 R9 Fury X flagship. The R9 Fury comes in a variety of custom Add-in-board flavors, the first to launch of which are the two cards mentioned earlier from Sapphire and Asus. Interestingly both offerings have something very special about them that we mean to bear on today.
Let's get-go talk near the Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X. This card packs a triple fan cooling solution featuring a large high density heatsink, making the card thicker than standard 2 PCIE slot graphics card designs. The three fans that Sapphire decided to become with aren't the standard affair seen on the previous 290 series tri-x cards, or electric current 390 series tri-x cards.
Sapphire decided to go with slightly larger fans that have a significantly deeper blade curvature. These fans are in fact identical to what we've seen from Sapphire on the vapor-X 7000 serial, namely the Hd 7950 and Hard disk 7970 Vapor-Ten cards, and they've been plainly put to very good employ on the Fury.
The Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X Is Quieter Than Its Water Cooled Bigger Brother The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
These fans maintain a higher static pressure and move a lot more air than what the standard "dual-X" and previous "tri-X" fans are capable of. Which allows Sapphire to keep them running at much lower RPMs to maintain a very gentle acoustic thumbprint, in other words they enable the creation of significantly quieter cooling solutions. And the R9 Fury Tri-X stands as a testament to this. At full load the bill of fare is significantly quieter than the quietest reference designed graphics card to date, which is the h2o-cooled Radeon R9 Fury X.
In Kevin'southward Carbotte'south review of the card over at Tom'south Hardware, even with a factory overclock, the Fury Tri-ten produced 37 deicebls of noise under a total gaming load. Which remarkably was actually beneath the ambient noise, making it completely inaudible according to Kevin.
The graphics carte du jour can't really be heard in a higher place the background noise.
Credit : Anandtech.com
The card was but equally quiet in noise testing conducted by Ryan Smith from our expert friends over at Anandtech.com
To put those numbers into perspective, the Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X at full load produces the same amount of noise as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti at idle. Making information technology the quietest high-end air-cooled card we take seen to appointment.
This is a quote of what Ryan Smith had to say most noise testing in his review of the menu at Annadtech.com
When it came time to run our load dissonance testing we were expecting good things from both cards, simply the results from the Sapphire Tri-X take completely blown our expectations. With sub-40dB(A) racket levels we ended upwardly running our load noise test iii unlike times in society to make sure there wasn't an error in our testing methodology. There wasn't.
What we have here and so is the quietest high power air cooled card nosotros have ever tested. In its OC configuration the Sapphire Tri-X carte du jour tops out at 38.2dB nether Crysis 3, less than 2dB(A) above our noise floor and most 5dB quieter than the serenity R9 Fury X. Switching to its reference configuration drives noise levels down fifty-fifty further, to just 37.8dB(A). To put that in perspective, the Sapphire Tri-10 under a gaming workload is as loud equally the GTX 980 Ti is at idle. Simply put, these results are astonishing.
Credit : Anandtech.com
Thankfully Sapphire delivers this unheard of whisper quiet nosie level without compromising temperatures.
Then it'southward clear that Sapphire has created quite a phenomenal carte du jour hither in terms of performance and acoustics. This is in office thanks to the notably over-engineered cooling solution and in part thanks to the meaty nature of the PCB blueprint enabled past HBM.
The brusk PCB allows the air to be pushed directly through the heatsink rather than exist diddled onto the PCB. This allows the air to movement more readily without creating turbulence which is traditionally a major correspondent to the overall noise production of air coolers.
Credit : Techpowerup
While the Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X is indeed extremely impressive, the STRIX from Asus also has something that'due south equally impressive, namely its power consumption. Merely like the Tri-X from Sapphire, Asus is selling the STRIX with a small-scale manufactory overclock.
| Radeon R9 Fury Launch Cards | |||||
| ASUS STRIX R9 Fury | Sapphire Tri-X R9 Fury | Sapphire Tri-X R9 Fury OC | |||
| Boost Clock | 1000MHz / 1020MHz (OC) | 1000MHz | 1040MHz | ||
| Memory Clock | 1Gbps HBM | 1Gbps HBM | 1Gbps HBM | ||
| VRAM | 4GB | 4GB | 4GB | ||
| Maximum ASIC Power | 216W | 300W | 300W | ||
| Length | 12" | 12" | 12" | ||
| Width | Double Slot | Double Slot | Double Slot | ||
| Libation Type | Open Air | Open up Air | Open up Air | ||
| Launch Appointment | 07/xiv/fifteen | 07/14/15 | 07/14/15 | ||
| Toll | $579 | $549 | $569 | ||
Even so, even compared to Sapphire'due south reference clocked Fury, the STRIX uses significantly less power.Interestingly, Asus rates the Fury STRIX equally a 219W graphics card while Sapphire rates its Tri-X as a 300W card.
Credit : Anandtech.com
In real earth testing, the Fury STRIX from asus consumes 47W than Sapphires factory overclocked Fury Tri-X and 29W less than the aforementioned carte running the reference 1000mhz clock speed. Interestingly Asus has designed a custom PCB for the Fury STRIX, unlike Sapphire which opted for the reference PCB layout, which is what this reduction in power consumption is attributed to.
Credit : Techpowerup
While 29W less at the wall for the same performance using the same chip might seem impressive, the effect of Asus'due south custom PCB is even more profound in the Furmark torture exam. Where the Asus Radeon R9 Fury STRIX consumes 122W less than the Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X.
Credit : Anandtech.com
This just goes to show how much power efficiency can be gained from tweaking the PCB layout and choice of components.
Now when it comes to choosing between both bill of fare's information technology'south there are multiple things to consider. In terms of noise levels in that location's simply no high-end air cooled graphics carte that beats the Sapphire Fury Tri-10. The Asus R9 Fury STRIX runs almost 4c degrees cooler only also generates significantly more dissonance. The card uses noticeably less ability however and the custom PCB may prove to exist a boon for overclocking. However until the overclocking software from both camps is updated to recognize the VRM's of these cards to enable voltage adjustments it'southward going to exist difficult to predict which will overclock more than generously.
It'south fascinating how two cards based on the exact same scrap can offer such a variety of advantages and such distinctly different appeals. Nosotros're excited to see what the residual of the AIBs volition come up up with. From what we've been hearing there will exist even more surprises, and then stay tuned.
Source: https://wccftech.com/wip-sapphire-fury-quieter-liquid-cooled-fury-asus-strix-significantly-power/
Posted by: sicilianosithered.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Sapphire Fury Tri-X Is Quieter Than Water Cooled AMD Fury X - Asus Strix Uses Significantly Less Power Than Both"
Post a Comment